Attach this Gauge R&R to your FAI report. CadNexa lets you link MSA studies to characteristic numbers in AS9102 Form 3. Audit-ready submissions.
Try in CadNexa →
Known true value of the calibration master
Specification limits of the part being measured
25–50 readings recommended (AIAG MSA)
Cg — REPEATABILITY
Cgk — REPEATABILITY + BIAS
n (samples)
Mean (x̄)
Std dev (s)
Bias (x̄ − ref)
Tolerance
%EV (study var.)
Cg = 0.2 × Tolerance / (6 × s)
Cgk = (0.1 × Tolerance − |Bias|) / (3 × s)
%EV = 6s / Tolerance × 100
Pass criteria: Cg ≥ 1.33 and Cgk ≥ 1.33

Acceptance criteria

Cg / CgkVerdictAction
≥ 1.67ExcellentUse as is — gauge well within capability
1.33 – 1.67CapableAcceptable per AIAG MSA — use for production
1.00 – 1.33MarginalAcceptable for non-critical features only — investigate
< 1.00Not capableReplace gauge or tighten the measurement procedure

What is Gauge R&R (Repeatability and Reproducibility)?

Gauge R&R is a Measurement System Analysis (MSA) study that tells you how much of your observed variation comes from the measurement system itself versus the actual part variation. If your gauge is contributing too much noise, your Cp/Cpk numbers are lying to you.

Cg and Cgk Formulas (AIAG MSA)

The AIAG MSA 4th edition uses these formulas for gauge capability:

Cg = (0.2 × Tolerance) / (6 × s)
Cgk = (0.1 × Tolerance − |Bias|) / (3 × s)

Where s is the standard deviation of repeated measurements on a reference standard, and Bias = (mean of measurements) − (reference value).

Pass / Fail Criteria

Worked Gauge R&R Example

You're verifying a digital caliper used to measure a 50.00 mm shaft (tolerance ±0.020 mm, so Tolerance = 0.040 mm). You measure a calibrated reference (50.000 mm) 25 times.

The gauge resolution is too coarse for this tolerance. You'd need either a tighter tolerance or a higher-resolution instrument (digital micrometer or air gauge).

Common Causes of Gauge R&R Failure

Workflow After Gauge R&R

Once your gauge passes MSA, you can confidently run a Cp/Cpk capability study. Document the MSA results in your PPAP submission as Element 10. For aerospace, attach the study to your AS9102 Form 3. Verify any final dimensions with measurement uncertainty analysis for high-precision parts.